Ontological:
A Call for New Theory
GST2
This website is dedicated toward the creation of unified theory and a potential construction that general principles, a theorem, can be created as part of a larger theory. (An example of a theorem is Equifinality as suggested by Ludwig von Bertalanffy. "The first is the principle of equifinality. In any closed system, the final state is unequivocally determined by the initial conditions..." http://www.panarchy.org/vonbertalanffy/systems.1968.html )
It is suggested, here, that creation of general theory through the theorem construction is a writing assignment.
The goal is to advance GST2 , General Systems Theory Squared ( http://gst2.bravehost.com ) that is the larger theory in question, here, so that general theory can become unified. That is Unified Systems Theory: UST. It is suggested, here, that part of that process of advancement may be ontological especially in the context in which GST2 handles information thus adjusting referent systems from a general to a unified orientation.
It is further suggested that ontology may be the difference between the general theory (GST2) and a unified theory (vis a vis Einstein). Again, that process is seen as a writing assignment.
Thereby, in writing, a Unified Theory of Systems could lead to a wider Unified Theory through the use of isomorphism (The Unity of Knowledge construction) throughout the various disciplines of human endeavor. I am confident that process is not only possible but eventual.
Lindblom
Click:
http://organizational.bravehost.com
Theorem:
"A theorem is a statement that can be demonstrated to be true by accepted mathematical operations and arguments.
In general, a theorem is an embodiment of some general principle that makes it part of a larger theory."
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Theorem.html
Frames of Reference
The following is a quote
1. Introduction:
The Non-Empirical Nature of the Ontological Arguments
2. The Classic Version of the Ontological Argument
a. The Argument Described
b. Gaunilo's Criticism
c. Aquinas's Criticisms
d. Kant's Criticism: Is Existence a Perfection?
3. Anselm's Second Version of the Ontological Argument
4. Modal Versions of the Argument
5. Bibliography
More?
Click:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/o/ont-arg.htm
See also:
۞ http://ontology.bravehost.com
Course:
Cognitive Science Systems at Harvard University:
Lindblom
bravenet.com